Why does the book impress marlow




















What power does the wilderness have over the Station, and what appears to motivate its occupants? On , what view of Kurtz does the Brickmaker a favorite of the Manager take? Why does he appear to resent Kurtz? On , Marlow says that he detests lies. Does this implied and elsewhere stated preference for truth hold constant in the novella? Does Marlow seem to understand his own character, or is he at times confused about his interests and beliefs?

On , how do the Manager and his nephew reveal their resentment of Kurtz in spite of that agent's obvious success as an ivory collector? What effect does their resentment have upon Marlow, who has overheard their conversation? On , how does Marlow describe the Congo River and its environs? How does he describe his interaction with the River? What illusion does the River promote?

What insight does it provide, at least so far as Marlow is concerned? On , what does Marlow imply is the basis for his ability to respond to the African natives he observes? To what extent does he here invoke the distinction often made between nature and culture, primitive and civilized? Does he accept that distinction? On , Marlow discovers a hut with some firewood and a book. Why does this book impress him? On , Marlow says that he came to an important realization as he neared Kurtz's Station.

What is the realization, and to what extent does it influence or explain his behavior in the rest of the story? On , what commentary does Marlow offer on the issue of "restraint"? What accounts for the restraint shown by the natives, and what accounts for the restraint shown by the Manager? On , Marlow speaks of Kurtz as "a voice.

What seems to be the reason for his fascination with Kurtz' voice? How does he feel about the native helmsman person who steers the boat? He opens the shutter and starts firing the rifle into the jungle. What happens to him? What does Marlow realise about his motivations? How does Marlow say Kurtz felt about the things around him? Why could Kurtz speak English? What had Kurtz later written at the end of his report? What similarity is there between the helmsman and Kurtz? What does Marlow do with the body, and how do the crew members feel about this?

What condition is it in? What does he say about the natives? What had he been doing in the Congo? What does he say Kurtz has done? The story IS the topic, right? Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.

Email required Address never made public. Name required. Search for:. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. Follow Following. Jekyll and Mr. The novel is based upon a tale of a man that is not happy in his current self, a higher class - good guy that everyone likes to be around. Jekyll is hunting a bad side, he wants to be an evil, dangerous man. His desire to achieve this second life takes him into a very strange psychological state.

It remains a constant battle for Dr. Jekyll throughout the entire novel to try and become Mr. Finally, as Walton is on a journey to the North Pole he encounters difficulties that nearly kill him and his crew. This shows that Victor and Walton are repeatedly searching for more knowledge even though it is dangerous. Victor finds his monster absolutely repulsive, and even nauseating. Frankenstein has never seen anything so horrible and soon falls ill both from the sight of it and the realization that his monster is now out in the world and it could be doing anything.

This shows how his drive for knowledge to be able to create life is damaging his health both mentally and physically. Both men throughout the book suppress their feelings for their wives until something goes wrong.

At that point, both men are willing to fight for their wives and do what is necessary to get them back or avenge for their pain. This gives the reader conclusions that George, similar to tom, turns to aggression to deal with unsettling situations. In conclusion, both men show characteristics that are similar despite their different upbringings. Twain uses the inhumane actions of Pap toward Huck to help develop the major theme of his novel. This quote shows how man is inhuman to other men, even if they are related and supposed to love each other.

Pap talks and acts mean towards Huck, even though Huck is his own son. Not only is Pap mentally abusive toward Huck, but he is also physically abusive toward him. The novel and movie incorporate similar themes and characterizations of certain characters in order to express the anti-war philosophy.

However, other aspects of the novel and movie, such as the idea of insanity and the introduction of the commanding officers, illustrate many clear differences between the movie and novel. These similarities and differences, in the way how both the novel and movie promote the anti-war philosophy, help us to broaden our understanding of the mentality of military officials during war and how war either corrupted, murdered or displaced the mental stability of soldiers and their commanding officers.

Catch and The Bridge on the River Kwai share common themes, such as ambition, anti-war, and the concept of Catch In Catch, the officers in Colonel Cathcart's squadron are in a Catch situation because Colonel Cathcart's fad ambition to become general and to impress his superiors, influences him to consistently raise the number of missions required for each officer to fly.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000