How is george clooney involved in the sudan conflict

George Clooney has visited Sudan and South Sudan on several occasions. Related Topics. Published 30 August Published 16 March Published 14 March Published 8 July Published 9 February Published 19 January As the team realized that they could accomplish what they set out to accomplish—a new form of data that was predictive—they also started to understand that they were working without an ethical net.

The idea of primum non nocere , or first, do no harm, is commonly associated with medicine, but it is also the basis for an important humanitarian principle, do no harm. What we did there for good, anyone else could do for any reason. This is a quintessential modern quandary. As data technology is racing ahead of regulation and common awareness, governments, companies, and individuals lack the ethical tools needed to decide where the lines are, much less how to hold transgressors accountable.

The article Raymond wrote with Sandvik, for example, proposes a theory of harm for the use of information communication technologies in mass atrocity response. But, like the urgent data that SSP collected, it is likely to take these ethical innovations some time to have an impact on the organizations and people for whom they are most important. War Criminal. The problem was not the lack of technology. The problem was, and continues to be, where the West decides to put its attention.

She is the author of an acclaimed trilogy of science fiction political thrillers, beginning with Infomocracy , and a new collection of of short fiction and poetry, Abdalla Hamdok wasn't sure he wanted the job, but six months later there is reason to hope—despite the failed mutiny this week. Shusha was the key to the recent war between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Now Baku wants to turn the fabled fortress town into a resort. Argument An expert's point of view on a current event.

By Malka Older. American actor George Clooney takes part in a press conference in central London to present a report on atrocities in South Sudan on Sept. An investigation team from Unamid, the joint UN-African Union peacekeeping mission, was only allowed to reach Tabit 10 days after the incident. The military denied the incident from the beginning as did the people of Tabit, probably because they were afraid.

The peacekeepers requested to be allowed to do another investigation but they were not allowed. Peacekeepers cannot move without government permission and must keep their movements to a minimum incase of carjackings or personal attacks.

People question its presence and effectiveness: how can it protect civilians if it cannot protect its own personnel? In general, the trust in the international community is diminishing. As for Clooney, I do not hear people talking about him or expecting anything. The most dramatic change is the escalation of tribal conflict, mass killings, and the burning of villages causing mass displacement. Until Darfur was one region, in it was divided into three areas: North, South and West.

In two more areas were added : Central and East. The government considered making deals with some tribes and not others. This just created new dynamics of conflict. Some young militia members are also heavily using drugs which affects their behaviour and actions.

The Doha peace deal was brokered in but no progress was made, apart from power sharing and allocation of positions to the former rebels. Does Darfur need another global campaign?

If you were in charge what would it be called? And what would it hope to achieve? Yes, for sure, but not just a media or celebrity campaign.

It should be led by the major powers in the UN security council to pressure conflicting parties to reach a comprehensive and just peace.

The actions of Khartoum is what has to change. A robust peacekeeping force is also required to ensure the government complies, it should be UN mandated and establish clear working relationships with the government on access, civilian protection and the free movement of peacekeepers.

The campaign could be called United for a Peaceful and Stable Darfur because what we need is security. The campaign could be called United for a Peaceful and Stable Darfur because what we need is security, ensuring our own safety so we can think, work and produce — with fear nothing can be achieved.

This account is from an aid worker from north Darfur, her name has been withheld to protect her identity. The global campaign on genocide was hardly felt or even heard of in Darfur, or for that matter in the more affluent, better-connected capital Khartoum.

Clooney is better known for his marriage to an Arab , the British-Lebanese lawyer Amal Alamuddin, than for his activism. Unfortunately he visited Darfur before the wedding. Almost 10 years after the global campaign on genocide not much has changed. The conflict continues, so do the reports of rape and human rights abuses. Life in Darfur continues to deteriorate alongside the overall state of affairs across the country. Tribal militias have emerged as a prominent third party to the ongoing violence.

Insecurity is rampant and the plight of the millions of internally displaced is no longer news, it is just normal. The separation of South Sudan in and the civil war that followed caused an influx of refugees, putting further stress on southern Darfur. Two peace agreements in and between various parties have both failed to deliver real peace. Darfur has changed for the worse, what we had in was much better than what we have now. The whole of Sudan needs a campaign, Darfur is part of a broader and bigger problem.

Similar conflicts are rampant in other parts of the country, including the states of Blue Nile and South Kordofan.